Previous research on pandemics, infectious disease, and recession suggests that Covid-19 could have a significant impact on the public\u2019s public policy preferences - and thus the environment in which policymakers will have to address the pandemic\u2019s consequences. Increased insecurity could result in an \u2018othering\u2019 process that fosters more socially conservative attitudes, is resistant to the process of globalization, and undermines social trust. At the same time, voters may react thermostatically to the increase in public expenditure and seek a return to the status quo ante. However, none of these developments are inevitable. Exposure to unemployment may increase support for welfare and encourage voters to reset their public spending thermostat. Framing by politicians may foster a social cohesion and solidarity that promotes social trust, heightens concern about inequality and tolerates diversity. The international character of the disease may persuade people of the importance of international collaboration. To address these possibilities, a module of 60 questions will be administered on two waves of NatCen\u2019s mixed mode random probability panel, all of whose members were previously interviewed for the annual British Social Attitudes (BSA) survey. The first wave will take place early summer 2020 and the second in spring 2021. The module will comprise questions asked on previous BSAs, together with measures of people\u2019s experience and perceptions of Covid-19. This design will make it possible to assess how attitudes have changed at both the aggregate and the individual level, and to link individual level change to people\u2019s views of the pandemic.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","categories":[],"frequency":[],"type_of_data":[],"yoast_head":"\n