At the beginning of the spread of Covid-19 in Italy, before the introduction of the lockdown \u201cstay at home\u201d measures in the whole country, in order to slow the rate of infection, the Government pushed for self-imposed measures of social distance and limitation of subjects\u2019 circulation. While many people started following the Government\u2019s prescriptions, young people kept on going out for happy hours, cocktails and dinners, meeting each other in crowded places. A possible explanation for this behavior may be the sense of invulnerability dictated by age. In fact, news reported that the elderly or people with previous diseases were the ones getting sick. We focus on the expected behavior of \u201cPhase two\u201d \u2013 that is what comes after the end of the lockdown \u2013 when general actions to reduce and prevent the spread of respiratory viruses (i.e. washing hands; avoid touching eyes, nose, mouth, etc.) will still be fundamental, and inquire whether the peer group considered when giving information on the spread of Covid-19 affects young people\u2019s decision to comply with recommended behaviors. We compare a neutral information with both an information focusing on the elderly and most vulnerable people and one focusing on young people. Information on individual characteristics and self-reported answers on personality traits, will allow us to investigate whether there is heterogeneity (for example by gender) in treatment effects and whether an eventual higher response of the treatment who receives information focusing on young people is driven by higher salience of selfish concerns.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","categories":[],"frequency":[],"type_of_data":[],"yoast_head":"\n